The Economist Blames Modi and Supports Rahul as Lesser Evil in the Eve of the Indian Election 2014: A Rebuttal-2

World’s encyclopedic knowledge compacted in your hand

HOME STYLE FAQ CONTENTS AUTHOR ABOUT US LINK DL CHANNEL ARTICLES NEWS JOKES QUOTES VIDEO CONTACT US SOCIAL SITES

2012 London Olympics Fever Grips India And China: Should India Celebrate? Freedom Of Expression: What Should Limit It And What Shouldn’t? Sexual Revolution Plus: A Joyous Or Fearful Event For Women In The Devel- oping Countries Like India And Pakistan? Has Humanity Failed? Do We Need The Fear of God To Keep Us Civilzed & Happy? Heavy Drinking & Early Death Rise Among Elderly. Can Faith Help?

Is Twitter, Facebook or Google+ The Best Social Networking Site For Your Message Spread? *Sexual Revolution Bro- ught STD And Social Change: Is Our World Becoming A Fearful Place? *Why The New York Times Reporting On Straus-Kahn Case Is Bad Reporting? *Mumbai And Delhi Terrorist Attacks: Will India Shining Vanish And Indians Share Pakistani Life? Do We Need Anonymity For Surfing Like The Laws For Phone Tapping? *Can Distressed Pakistan Fight T errorism On Its Soil After The Karachi Attack? *Did Distrust of Pakistan Aid in The Nabbing Of Bin Laden? *Did Sigmund Freud Cont- ribute to The Modern Civilization? *Did the Chinese Civiliz- ation Contribute to the Modern World? *Will There Be a Clash of Civilizations With Islam? *Did the British Empire Contribute to the Format- ion of Modern Civilization? *Have Women Contributed to the Formation of Modern Civilization? *Is Britain’s Parliament- ary System of Democra- cy Ideal?

Delhi Commonwealth Games: Who Is At Fault? Recent UK Riots: Is The French Revolution’s Product- ‘Right of Man’ – At Fault

1 2

‘Past, Present & Future civilizations of mankind in a single encyclopedia by a single author - A truly unique book’

Please share our informative site with your dear ones in Twitter, Facebook, Google+ etc.

Why so many & such a variety of articles here?

Rape Epidemic: Causes, Facilitators,Types, Epidem-iology and Prevention of This Modern Disease State of the Indian State: Scant Thinkers 2 Corruptions & 3 Epidemics:Solving Those & Making It a World Leader Jinnah's House Destroyed By Milita- nts:Did Jinnah Fathom It Coming When He Created Pakistan?

OUR ARTICLES

British Parliament's Decision Not To Attack Syria: Wrong Timing? Wrong Decision?

The Syrian Problem And How To Solve It

Mr Modi Becoming The Next Prime Minister of India: Can He? Should He?

Please share your thoughts about the book articles, site etc. with us Use form or

kri200@womenspowerbook.org

Watch these author collected interesting videos

Please read these author collected news stories

Author written articles are arranged here. Please read them and enjoy

‘Knowledge is power’

First T i m e Three C i v i l i z a t i o n s Four R e l i g i o n s Single A u t h o r E n c y c l o p e d i a

H o w d o e s t h i s ‘w o m e n ’s b i b l e’ e m p o w e r m e n?

Watch this lady expressing her views about the encyclopedia

W h y i s t h i s b o o k ‘F i r s t t i m e’ i n HUMAN HISTORY’?

Comment Box is loading comments...

The Economist Blames Modi and Supports Rahul as Lesser Evil in the Eve of the Indian Election 2014: A Rebuttal-2

Furthermore, with half of those killed in 2002 Gujarat riots being Hindus – killed by Modi's troops and by Muslims – while using 'pogrom' in this instance is not doing justice to the word, and not mentioning Hindus' plight is not doing justice to the families of dead Hindus, not blaming Modi or even Muslims for the Hindu deaths is a denial of logical thought that concludes it was a riot. Almost as a shocker to The Economist, this suggests the alleged sectarian anti-Muslim, Modi, actually killed his own ilk— the Hindus! A logical interpretation of this killing of Hindus clearly shows Modi not hesitating to use state machinery to kill his 'own people' to effectively quell the riot. With him effectively ruling over a riot-free state, in which Muslims also progressed and even freely voted for him, and his recent assertions tending to unite people of different faiths, ethnicities, castes, etc. under a futuristic vision as never before, its repeat of the slogan 'Modi is a divisive figure' isn't right. In fact it almost brings in 'If he divides, he divides people who believe in the media hype and who do research'. With the RSS seeking a civil code for all, even his associ- ation with the latter isn't so divisive. Even if he strays from his futuristic vision as a PM, with India being dependent on Middle Eastern petrol and jobs, him being constrained by national and international laws like Tony Blair and Net-equipped globalised world ogling at his prime ministerial ways, means him causing divisional or other problems is as plausible as Congress winning this election. The paper expressing fear of future under his leadership is thus pure scaremongering. With army not treading? to take over power, Indira Gandhi getting flak for the Emergency, freedom of speech being cherished as in USA and election comm- ission being impartial, even him turning into a dictator isn't plausible. With Atom Bomb stopping all wars – even making a boring world as Fukuyama says – Modi can't take India to war aga- inst Pakistan. Far from not knowing what Modi will do, as the article suggests, his assertions make it pretty clear. Altho- ugh its beneficiary, Pakistani elite, alone can solve the hostility problem by lessening Jihadists, if Modi does what he says, through use of efficient manpower and technologies as by Israel, he can make infiltration futile and lessen hostility. Even if not good for the arms-selling West, this reduction in hostility is good news for average Pakistanis, who get no goodies but fear of routine bombings alone. While its support for a non-winning party, unlike a brilliant U-turn by the USA, shows lack of concern for its future, its advice given to Modi and Rahul show lack of thought about their implications. For example, its suggestion to choose a leader other than Modi after election does not see the greater tragedy of cheating of the people, ransacking of BJP offices and even killing of BJP leaders by the cheated. With it being a coalition victory and his associates being drenched in corruption, the paper suggesting victorious Rahul to step back and promote mode- rnisation sounds farfetched. To really modernise the country, he has to end corruption. This means putting many leaders, including his family members, in jail. Expecting this lone novice to do the above is unthinkable. Instead, a rise of unpunis- hed corrupt as a disaster, could easily lead India into a West-dependent state, and a burden to UN charity agencies. Lesser of the two evils, thus, could easily be the greater. Like the al Qaeda and the secular rebels fighting in unison against a common enemy Assad, post-secular, non-divisive Congress president Sonia Gandhi's meet with the Sahi Bukhari of Jama Masjid, unifier-seeking The Economist suddenly finds itself aligned with the divisive latter in the fight against Modi. Though a huge reaction makes 'Indians don't give a damn about foreign media' wrong, like the backfiring of the Sonia Sahi meet, that foreign sentiment backfiring on the paper's goals may not be so wrong. Finally, freedom of expression is extremely important for the progress of mankind and the paper has the right to a free speech. But that right has limitations. Airing untruth is one of them. Link to The Economist article ----------------------------

Contd ...