Is Twitter, Facebook or Google The Best Social Networking
Site For Your Message Spread?
Although grouped as ‘social networking sites’, when rivalry & peculiarities are
considered, commonality amongst the 3 titans almost ends there. It almost
reminds you of West European principalities competing & cutting each other’s
soldiers that enticed exploration of the ‘resterners’ - cut throat competition
between the ‘principalities’ of this network entices exploration of technology &
psychology.
However, unlike resentment of the former, this competition finds no haters.
Forget firms, clash of the titans, because in fact, it has percolated to the lesser
mortals. Almost like scribes orgasmically writing about clashing politicians,
endorsing our headline, even bloggers – the secondary reporters, have joined
in the speculative fray. As if uniting all, ‘Which is the best among the 3?’
suddenly emerges as a common query.
With them choosing different dates of birth & boasting avid followers – who
are happy with what they use, & probing almost amounting to comparing
apples with oranges, choosing the best isn’t easy. If trend is anything to go by,
while Twitter with 350 million users & Facebook with 800 million can even
make a pivotal shift in Net access & almost govern human behavior. Google+,
the newest baby of the search engine dinosaur, Google, even boasts a growth
spurt at 40 million. With it bridging the gaps in the other two, its facilities
amaze me, not the catching up.
Although message delivery, as a way of spread, is offered by all 3, like the
making of a superstar, large follower count gives boost & boast to firms
attached to all, & firms crave for a date with 5% of those followers who really
matter in all - it’s the differing services that make the 3 titans distinct, if not
essential.
FACEBOOK: Designed by a few uni geeks in a room, launched in 2004, &
aimed at bringing friends & families above the age of 13 together – not quite
clients, Facebook drags both underage kids & traditional housewives to their
PCs. Changing human behavior, this brand challenges mighty search
engines.
PROS: Like in Twitter, messages can be offered to follower's screens or sent
to them directly. But then those aren’t limited by the magical 140 characters.
Having the facility to create pages reflecting aspects, it allows the uploading of
person tagged pics & videos to the right page that can be liked or commented
upon in a stream. As if proving ‘picture tells a thousand words,' while intense
interest in family pics brings women to their PCs – even disproves women
prefer audio alone, comments on those & chat almost makes them glued.
Addiction isn’t unheard of. When apps & games are added, even men don’t
claim immunity. And when firms show keenness, akin to the glamour of ‘fan’ &
‘followers’, its Fan page that can go viral forms the mum of all temptations
there.
Almost reminding body – gut bug symbiosis, Facebook & Obama campaign
symbiotically and are boosted by each other. While enhancing video chat, the
addition of Skype has made it even bigger, and cheaper ads there is making
smaller firms larger. Matching counts, firms have made millions there.
Matching counts again, the Google search engine has turned envious, if not
silently hostile.
QUESTION
* Why are there
so many
articles on
different subjects?
* Why are there
so many
accounts
on
Twitter?
Raise the vol to listen to the
lady airing awe @ the SINGLE author encyclopedia
World’s
encyclopedic
knowledge
compacted
in
your
hand
Empowering Book Newsletter
WOMEN’S POWER: ITS PAST, ITS PRESENT, ITS FUTURE: FEMOCRACY