Almost ending all discussions, Freud thundered, ‘Women can’t contribute
to civilization.' With there being very little input from the fairer sex in
history compared to men, Freud almost got scot-free with his statement.
However, with women going through suppression due to what the
feminists call patriarchy, while it was natural for him to say so, as a
reaction, it was not unnatural for feminists to accuse him of being a male
chauvinist either. No wonder the endless clash between feminists and
Freudians reminds one of clash of civilizations.
However, irrespective of the clash, her lack of noticeable contributions to
history’s pocket civilizations was not due to her innate inability. It was due
to her lack of awareness. With men having the key to her awareness,
feminists, again, were not wrong in blaming patriarchy for her small
contribution in history. Having no education, being stuck at home, and not
really allowed to express their views outside, it was, in fact, difficult to
expect contribution from them. In fact, with no rights, their lives at times
were miserable and women’s empowerment was never even thought of.
Almost constituting empowerment of women, today we see that women
are not only contributing but are fully reaping the benefit of modern
civilization. With its help, they in fact, have unleashed their powers, never
known in human history. Their success statistics in many fields is
staggering. They have achieved this success in just a single century,
when they were given the opportunity to educate themselves and work
They, however, have not succeeded in politics. In fact, Afghanistan has
more female MPs than Canada. This is simply because political parties
follow a process of selection of candidates and don’t give enough seats to
Leaving politics aside, did they contribute to the formation of this
civilization, which has given them so much? Almost as an answer, while
less of her education made her contribute less than men, more of his
arrogance did not notice, even those. Nevertheless, her contributions
went parallel to that of men, at least in significance, if not in quantity.
Interestingly, while modern civilization not managing without computers is
well known, a woman as a first computer programmer is less known.
Paralleling this, many other women contributors and their contributions
are relatively less known. Men’s contributions, on the other hand, get
luckier by the day.
It is interesting that unlike ‘pocket civilizations,' modern civilization,
uniquely, has been formed by the contributions of people from many
‘pocket civilizations.' Parallel to it, women from different cultures have
contributed to the formation of this civilization. In its discussion about the
past, present and future of mankind, noting this discrepancy, the book
‘Women’s Power: Its Past, Its present, Its Future: Femocracy’ recognizes
not only the contribution made by women from the west but by women
from of other cultures as well.
How does this ‘women’s bible’
What visitors have said:
Amanda advised me reg link, liked, waiting
desparately for print version.Cheers
Ms Joanne Dunne
Got the link from one of my work mate in
Bradford. As a woman would like to have a
Mrs Amanda Hall
Can't wait for the book. I want a first edition
signed copy when it gets published.
Mr John Leeming
Seems nice book looking forward to see the
Mr Gary Dillon
... Why not tell us what you think?
This encyclopaedia isn't published
yet, but please reflect on the variety
and depth of views aired in the
articles that get justice, not in 1 but
4 different blogs.They indicate, both
the vastness and depth of the subj-
ects discussed in the book. If you
are an intellectual, communicate
to us your admiration, derision
or a challenge to our blasph-
emous claims. We promise