Why do Indians Resent The Coverage of Modi
by The Western Media Houses Like CNN, The Economist, BBC et al?1
World’s
encyclopedic
knowledge
compacted
in
your
hand
What is Not Seen
But then, what they don't see are these clearly discernable facts
The detachment is such that lacking self reflection, these reporters fail to see the Western
ideals oozing out of Mr Modi. While his rise from a humble beginning to the present is akin to
that of Abraham Lincoln - let alone the rags to riches American dream- his oratory power is as
mesmerising as that of Obama - with whom he happens to share social discrimination. While
going beyond protestant work ethics he hasn't taken leave since the last 12 years, going
beyond a householder wish, he has offered his salary to the poor. Despite vilification, he has
shown love for freedom of expression and offered praise to the Indian media for making him
prominent.
Despite being called divisive and media pointedly dragging him into religion, he has
consistently refused to see electorate on any line other than on development. In fact, done
earlier only by a sympathy wave (Mrs. Gandhi's death), his message of development has
created history by making voters transcend faith, ethnicity, language and cast. Even Muslims,
who are supposed to fear him, voted for him. Despite making a feast of politician's mistress
scandals in the West, him sacrificing his wife for the sake of the country is not seen. Also not
seen is his love of freedom of speech. His use of 3D technology not done in USA or UK is
awaiting record recognition. After victory, almost as a statesman, through Twitter he has asked
some oppositions party stalwarts to work together for the sake of the country. Continuing
statesmanship, while he sees every citizen important, seeing neighbours as important he has
invited all SAARC leaders.
Even if the scary Hindutwa is invoked to scare Muslims, its core belief, amazingly, is respect
for all religions!
With the educated and optimistic Muslims, who voted for him not sharing the reporters'
apprehension, this scaremongering itself becomes an insult to their intelligence. Furthermore,
like Ms Clinton not finding Modi's mass graves, they will not find their views proven in the
future.
And Finally...
And finally, though Indians have shown anger against the misguided reporters, unlike them, the
man who has also been called Nero despite having the deepest regard for his mother, will
rather praise them for making him prominent! This is exactly what he did to the Indian media
people, who feasted on criticising him for more than 10 years. This should bring the vive of
Gandhi, whom he respects so much.
------------------------------
Thanks for reading the article. Please do not forget to send us your comments
Raise the vol to listen to the
lady airing awe @ the SINGLE author encyclopedia
WOMEN’S POWER: ITS PAST, ITS PRESENT, ITS FUTURE: FEMOCRACY
QUESTION
* Why are there
so many
articles on
different subjects?
* Why are there
so many
accounts
on
Twitter?