2024 Election: Why Modi lost and why his coalition
government is good for both India and Bharat
World’s
encyclopedic
knowledge
compacted
in
your
hand
Raise the vol to listen to the
lady airing awe @ the SINGLE author encyclopedia
behaved like the ex-Muslim YouTube sites for the mullahs. Even if it was from
What’s App University, people learned not only of the BJP’s love for the anti-
Hindu Congress’ beef exports, almost like the cash for questioning the Hindu
party was seen taking cash from beef exporting companies. Sitaraman’s ‘beef
means buffalo meat’ wasn’t believed even by her husband. It looked like nothing
could go right this time. Love for Modi would be the domain of Modi
Bhaktas—now the Modi family alone.
The after-effects:
Again, as if the man had grabbed the book, cash, and faith symbol as a child,
despite the shame of the loss of majority that too against a party that had nothing
to offer, having barely won even his own seat, having no experience in coalition
politics, and having declining age, speech, and prestige, Modi still showed a
craze for power in a coalition! But the good news is, despite the patchwork, he
will be good for both Bharat and India!
Good for India and Bharat:
1.
The good PM for India:
The country that was reeling through the ‘garibi hatau’ slogan for five generations
and had to offer little, got hold of Modi in 2014. He did not quite make the
predicted one party state but his global outreach, India as a global market, and
the global economic rank of 4th place did make Indians proud. The enhanced
investment in India, the civilian, space, and army productions, the infrastructure,
including transport systems and home toilets making, and the subsidies reaching
individuals in full would have been a dream for the earlier PM Chandrasekhar.
Even if corruption did not make all true, programmes were good. More
importantly he is hard working and has plans and goals for the future. IHis
continuation as a live attenuated virus vaccine will be good for India till Yogi turns
up
2.
The denial of dictatorship through power sharing:
Except for Modi bhaktas, none like Modi as a dictator. Almost like virulence
removal in live attenuated virus vaccines, the removal of the power craze and the
addition of equality can make Modi good for both India and Bharat. Yes, absolute
power corrupts absolutely, but luckily there are no absolutes here. Even if
‘breakage and merger’ is attempted or partners surrender, his dictatorship can’t
begin. The government collapse, instead, can also equally begin. Additionally,
yes, by disliking bad reportage Modi could avoid press conferences, but despite
any exposures, parliament attendance is a must. The Congress may not have
won, but unlike earlier and more like a high tide, its benches have swollen. Even
if that given confidence is accounted for, the aetiology of Rahul’s butterfly-like
metamorphosis from a laughing stock to a fluent and fiery speaker, however,
remains unknown. Known for being childish, ‘The emperor is naked’ said he. In
fact, when the legislature’s cacophony reminds one of the corona virus saga and
the speaker's controlling ‘order order’ as seen in the UK turns into helplessness,
the globe sees a ‘fish market’ at play in the Indian parliament. The noise once
even made Modi’s Amit angrily say, ‘You can’t allow him to say this’ to his chosen
yet confused speaker. In fact, almost like a queue-fed-up Russian finding a
building top's queue for suicide, even a blame-avoiding strategic exit brought him
taunts while doing so. Poor soul! Outside, yes, to the cash for vote ladies seeking
promised cash, it simply said ‘we did not win’ and removed it from the news. The
collapse of inaugurated structures and leaks in the Ram Temple are not only
show something bad but show how bad things actually are in practice.
3.
The Gujariti elite factor:
Since Nitish and Naidu aren’t Gujaritis, ‘What Gujarati elite thinks today, the rest
will think tomorrow’ can’t happen unless aids surrender like Yogi. Commerce will
see diversity and wider competitiveness, not a Gujarati monopoly. The Russian
gas saga could tame Modi.
4.
It can’t be bad for Bharat.
Almost as ‘you can’t fool people all the time’, he can’t offer Triptikaran, make
Hindus 8th class citizens, show cruelty towards Hindu women, enhance beef
exports, and then attach gimmicks to claim ‘we are a Hindu party’. He can’t offer
pain to Jammu, Manipur, and Char Dham, and he can’t loot temples and starve
priests. Education has to teach the truth. Being hard-working and topping stats in
the West, equality alone is enough for the easily pleased 8th-class Hindus.
5.
A major change in political philosophy:
Since the upgrading of Muslim appeasement to Triptikaran brought in zero
dividends from Muslims and even a loss of Hindu votes, like the change in
election philosophy by AAP from caste to development, as a change of Indian
political philosophy, Muslim appeasement will be left to the Congress Party alone,
where it works. Madani may say the 0/100 vote was revenge against the BJP, but
as a strategy, a 25/75 vote would have made the BJP crave for more and
appease them. The chosen strategy of 0/100 voting will only make the Muslims
less useful, powerless, and disregarded, like in Assam. Unless educated Hindus
continue to desert India for better pastures, the aim of Guzwai Hind will stay at a
dream level alone. Yogi’s denial of Eid Namaz on the streets could be just
vengeance or an indication of that.
The election result may be bad for Modi, but it’ll be good for both India and
Bharat, as said above. Humiliating defeat, loss of glory or respect, and increased
accusations and exposures in parliament will take their toll on him. But, even if he
feels bad and weak, Yogi will reciprocally feel free and strong, and take over from
him. Yes, Yogi has faulted under Modi’s pressure and has to face his bad karma,
but once free, hopefully he will 'resurrect’ like what happened to Hanuman ji, and
offer both, equality to all citizens and development.
WOMEN’S POWER: ITS PAST, ITS PRESENT, ITS FUTURE: FEMOCRACY
QUESTION
* Why are there
so many
articles on
different subjects?
* Why are there
so many
accounts
on
Twitter?